Copy link
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Last updated: 11/03/2025
Key Points
- Aspiration of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) can lead to meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), a type of aspiration pneumonia with multiple physiological effects and consequences.
- If MSAF is present at delivery, intrapartum oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning is not recommended, and tracheal suctioning is only advised for depressed neonates.
Introduction
- Meconium is a viscous green-black substance composed of swallowed amniotic fluid, gastrointestinal epithelial cells, and intestinal secretions produced by the fetus.1
- MSAF occurs when fetal colonic activity is stimulated before delivery, leading to the passage of meconium in utero.
- MSAF is present in 10–15% of all deliveries, most commonly among term and postterm infants.1
- General risk factors include thick meconium, fetal distress, postterm pregnancy, rupture of membranes ≥ 18 hours, chorioamnionitis, shoulder dystocia, oligohydramnios, vaginal breech delivery, and intrauterine growth restriction.5,6
- Antenatal and intrapartum factors—such as chronic placental insufficiency, postterm pregnancy, and intrauterine stress—can increase the likelihood of in-utero meconium passage and aspiration.5,6
- MAS occurs when meconium-containing fluid is aspirated into the fetal or neonatal airway, typically during gasping or agonal respirations in response to hypoxia or distress.2
- MAS develops in approximately 2–9% of neonates born through MSAF and represents a form of chemical pneumonitis with airway obstruction, inflammation, and surfactant inactivation.
- Pathophysiologic effects include airway obstruction, alveolar inflammation, surfactant washout, decreased compliance, and pulmonary vasoconstriction leading to persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).1,3,4
- Clinical severity ranges from mild respiratory distress to severe hypoxemia with PPHN requiring mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
- MAS is now recognized as a multifactorial disorder involving both antenatal inflammation and intrapartum hypoxia rather than purely postnatal aspiration1.
- Complications may include air leak syndromes (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum), long-term reactive airway disease, and neurodevelopmental impairment following severe hypoxia.1,2
- Systemic inflammatory response: Meconium in the airways and gastrointestinal tract can trigger cytokine release, correlating with disease severity.1,4
- Mortality remains up to 5%, with higher rates associated with thick meconium, fetal distress, and delayed resuscitation1.
Table 1. Pathophysiologic consequences of meconium aspiration1,2
Abbreviation: PPHN, pulmonary hypertension of the newborn
Management
- General Principles
- MAS is no longer considered a purely postnatal aspiration event; aspiration often occurs in utero in the setting of fetal hypoxia or distress.
- Routine intrapartum oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal suctioning does not prevent MAS and is not recommended.2
- Management focuses on supportive ventilation, oxygenation, and treatment of pulmonary hypertension, rather than aggressive airway suctioning.2
- Initial delivery room management
- All infants born through MSAF should receive standard neonatal resuscitation per Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) 2021.3
- Vigorous infants (good tone, spontaneous respirations, HR more than 100 bpm)1,3,4:
- Routine tracheal or oropharyngeal suctioning → not indicated.
- Provide routine care and observation.
- Nonvigorous or depressed infants (poor tone, inadequate breathing)1,3,4:
- Prioritize initial steps of resuscitation — warming, drying, positioning, and clearing secretions as needed.
- If airway obstruction is suspected, consider tracheal suctioning before initiating positive pressure ventilation.
- Amnioinfusion for meconium dilution is not recommended.
- Historical perspective:
- Earlier management presumed that meconium aspiration occurred after birth with the onset of breathing.
- This led to routine suctioning of the oropharynx and trachea at delivery, including suctioning after head delivery and again after visualization by the resuscitation team.
- Subsequent studies showed these techniques did not reduce the incidence or severity of MAS.
- MAS is now understood to result from in utero aspiration in the setting of fetal hypoxia, rather than a purely postnatal event.
- Routine oropharyngeal suctioning is no longer recommended, as it may cause several adverse effects.1-4
- Vagal bradycardia
- Mucosal irritation and increased secretions
- Airway trauma and infection risk
- Apnea
Table 2. Management strategies for meconium aspiration syndrome
Abbreviations: MAS, meconium aspiration syndrome; MSAF, meconium-stained amniotic fluid; ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; HPV, high frequency ventilation; PPHN, persistent pulmonary hypertension; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; iNO, inhaled nitric oxide
Anesthetic Management
- Anesthesia providers may be called to assist with neonatal resuscitation when pediatric or neonatal teams are not immediately available.
- Familiarity with NRP guidelines is essential; many obstetric anesthesiologists maintain NRP certification.
- During deliveries complicated by MSAF, anesthesia personnel can contribute expertise in:
- Airway management (e.g., mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, suctioning if indicated).
- Vascular access and medication administration during neonatal resuscitation
- Maternal support during emergency interventions, including emergent cesarean delivery or postpartum complications.
- Delivery room considerations for an anesthesiologist include:
- Anesthesia presence is often requested for high-risk deliveries, especially in settings where neonatology support is not immediately available, including:
- Thick meconium or nonreassuring fetal heart tracing.
- Operative vaginal or emergent cesarean delivery.
- Known fetal distress or depression at delivery.
- Providers should ensure:
- Immediate availability of airway equipment suitable for neonatal resuscitation (mask, laryngoscope, endotracheal tube, suction).
- Coordination with obstetric and pediatric teams to clarify roles before delivery.
- Rapid transition to neonatal or neonatal intensive care unit personnel once initial stabilization is achieved.
- Anesthesia presence is often requested for high-risk deliveries, especially in settings where neonatology support is not immediately available, including:
- Anesthetic Implications for the Parturient
- Maternal anesthesia choice (neuraxial vs general) generally does not alter MAS risk, but:
- Emergent cesarean delivery for fetal distress may necessitate rapid-sequence induction, requiring anticipation of neonatal depression.
- Maternal hypotension or hypoxemia should be minimized, as these contribute to fetal hypoxia and possible meconium passage.
- When general anesthesia is required, ensure neonatal resuscitation personnel are present and prepared for potential airway intervention.
- Maternal anesthesia choice (neuraxial vs general) generally does not alter MAS risk, but:
Conclusion and Guidelines
- Routine tracheal suctioning is not indicated in vigorous infants, but anesthesia teams may assist with tracheal intubation and suction in nonvigorous neonates if obstruction is suspected.
- Communication and preparation between obstetric, anesthesia, and pediatric teams are critical for optimal outcomes.
- NRP certification and familiarity with neonatal airway management are strongly encouraged for obstetric anesthesia providers.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Pediatrics, and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation have provided statements about suctioning and resuscitation.
References
- Baird, Month, Arkoosh. Neonatal Resuscitation. In: Shnider SM, Levinson G, eds. Shnider and Levinson’s Anesthesia for Obstetrics. 5th ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013: 251-252.
- Wyckoff MH et al. 2021 NRP guidelines. Pediatrics. 2021;148(3) Link
- Rozance, Rosenberg. The Neonate. In: Gabbe, Neibyl, Simpson, Landon, Galan, Jauniaux, Driscoll, Berghella, Grobman. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Seventh Edition. Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier, 2017: 477-478.
- Osman A, Halling C, Crume M, et al. Meconium aspiration syndrome: a comprehensive review. J Perinatol. 2023;43(10):1211-21. PubMed
- Chiruvolu A, Fine S, Miklis KK, Desai S. Perinatal risk factors associated with the need for resuscitation in newborns born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Resuscitation. 2023; 185:109728. PubMed
- Gallo DM, Romero R, Bosco M, et al. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1158-S1178. PubMed
Other References
- ACOG. Delivery of a Newborn With Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid. Published March 2017. Accessed November 3, 2025. Link
- Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, et al. Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S543-S560. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267 PubMed
Copyright Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.