Search on website
Filters
Show more
chevron-left-black Summaries

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome

Key Points

  • Aspiration of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) can lead to meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), a type of aspiration pneumonia with multiple physiological effects and consequences.
  • If MSAF is present at delivery, intrapartum oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning is not recommended, and tracheal suctioning is only advised for depressed neonates.

Introduction

  • Meconium is a viscous green-black substance composed of swallowed amniotic fluid, gastrointestinal epithelial cells, and intestinal secretions produced by the fetus.1
  • MSAF occurs when fetal colonic activity is stimulated before delivery, leading to the passage of meconium in utero.
    • MSAF is present in 10–15% of all deliveries, most commonly among term and postterm infants.1
  • General risk factors include thick meconium, fetal distress, postterm pregnancy, rupture of membranes ≥ 18 hours, chorioamnionitis, shoulder dystocia, oligohydramnios, vaginal breech delivery, and intrauterine growth restriction.5,6
    • Antenatal and intrapartum factors—such as chronic placental insufficiency, postterm pregnancy, and intrauterine stress—can increase the likelihood of in-utero meconium passage and aspiration.5,6
  • MAS occurs when meconium-containing fluid is aspirated into the fetal or neonatal airway, typically during gasping or agonal respirations in response to hypoxia or distress.2
    • MAS develops in approximately 2–9% of neonates born through MSAF and represents a form of chemical pneumonitis with airway obstruction, inflammation, and surfactant inactivation.
    • Pathophysiologic effects include airway obstruction, alveolar inflammation, surfactant washout, decreased compliance, and pulmonary vasoconstriction leading to persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).1,3,4
    • Clinical severity ranges from mild respiratory distress to severe hypoxemia with PPHN requiring mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
    • MAS is now recognized as a multifactorial disorder involving both antenatal inflammation and intrapartum hypoxia rather than purely postnatal aspiration1.
  • Complications may include air leak syndromes (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum), long-term reactive airway disease, and neurodevelopmental impairment following severe hypoxia.1,2
  • Systemic inflammatory response: Meconium in the airways and gastrointestinal tract can trigger cytokine release, correlating with disease severity.1,4
  • Mortality remains up to 5%, with higher rates associated with thick meconium, fetal distress, and delayed resuscitation1.

Table 1. Pathophysiologic consequences of meconium aspiration1,2
Abbreviation: PPHN, pulmonary hypertension of the newborn

Management

  • General Principles
    • MAS is no longer considered a purely postnatal aspiration event; aspiration often occurs in utero in the setting of fetal hypoxia or distress.
    • Routine intrapartum oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal suctioning does not prevent MAS and is not recommended.2
    • Management focuses on supportive ventilation, oxygenation, and treatment of pulmonary hypertension, rather than aggressive airway suctioning.2
  • Initial delivery room management
    • All infants born through MSAF should receive standard neonatal resuscitation per Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) 2021.3
    • Vigorous infants (good tone, spontaneous respirations, HR more than 100 bpm)1,3,4:
      • Routine tracheal or oropharyngeal suctioning → not indicated.
      • Provide routine care and observation.
    • Nonvigorous or depressed infants (poor tone, inadequate breathing)1,3,4:
      • Prioritize initial steps of resuscitation — warming, drying, positioning, and clearing secretions as needed.
      • If airway obstruction is suspected, consider tracheal suctioning before initiating positive pressure ventilation.
    • Amnioinfusion for meconium dilution is not recommended.
  • Historical perspective:
    • Earlier management presumed that meconium aspiration occurred after birth with the onset of breathing.
    • This led to routine suctioning of the oropharynx and trachea at delivery, including suctioning after head delivery and again after visualization by the resuscitation team.
    • Subsequent studies showed these techniques did not reduce the incidence or severity of MAS.
    • MAS is now understood to result from in utero aspiration in the setting of fetal hypoxia, rather than a purely postnatal event.
  • Routine oropharyngeal suctioning is no longer recommended, as it may cause several adverse effects.1-4
    • Vagal bradycardia
    • Mucosal irritation and increased secretions
    • Airway trauma and infection risk
    • Apnea

Table 2. Management strategies for meconium aspiration syndrome
Abbreviations: MAS, meconium aspiration syndrome; MSAF, meconium-stained amniotic fluid; ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; HPV, high frequency ventilation; PPHN, persistent pulmonary hypertension; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; iNO, inhaled nitric oxide

Anesthetic Management

  • Anesthesia providers may be called to assist with neonatal resuscitation when pediatric or neonatal teams are not immediately available.
  • Familiarity with NRP guidelines is essential; many obstetric anesthesiologists maintain NRP certification.
  • During deliveries complicated by MSAF, anesthesia personnel can contribute expertise in:
    • Airway management (e.g., mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, suctioning if indicated).
    • Vascular access and medication administration during neonatal resuscitation
    • Maternal support during emergency interventions, including emergent cesarean delivery or postpartum complications.
  • Delivery room considerations for an anesthesiologist include:
    • Anesthesia presence is often requested for high-risk deliveries, especially in settings where neonatology support is not immediately available, including:
      • Thick meconium or nonreassuring fetal heart tracing.
      • Operative vaginal or emergent cesarean delivery.
      • Known fetal distress or depression at delivery.
    • Providers should ensure:
      • Immediate availability of airway equipment suitable for neonatal resuscitation (mask, laryngoscope, endotracheal tube, suction).
      • Coordination with obstetric and pediatric teams to clarify roles before delivery.
      • Rapid transition to neonatal or neonatal intensive care unit personnel once initial stabilization is achieved.
  • Anesthetic Implications for the Parturient
    • Maternal anesthesia choice (neuraxial vs general) generally does not alter MAS risk, but:
      • Emergent cesarean delivery for fetal distress may necessitate rapid-sequence induction, requiring anticipation of neonatal depression.
      • Maternal hypotension or hypoxemia should be minimized, as these contribute to fetal hypoxia and possible meconium passage.
    • When general anesthesia is required, ensure neonatal resuscitation personnel are present and prepared for potential airway intervention.

Conclusion and Guidelines

  • Routine tracheal suctioning is not indicated in vigorous infants, but anesthesia teams may assist with tracheal intubation and suction in nonvigorous neonates if obstruction is suspected.
  • Communication and preparation between obstetric, anesthesia, and pediatric teams are critical for optimal outcomes.
  • NRP certification and familiarity with neonatal airway management are strongly encouraged for obstetric anesthesia providers.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Pediatrics, and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation have provided statements about suctioning and resuscitation.

References

  1. Baird, Month, Arkoosh. Neonatal Resuscitation. In: Shnider SM, Levinson G, eds. Shnider and Levinson’s Anesthesia for Obstetrics. 5th ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013: 251-252.
  2. Wyckoff MH et al. 2021 NRP guidelines. Pediatrics. 2021;148(3) Link
  3. Rozance, Rosenberg. The Neonate. In: Gabbe, Neibyl, Simpson, Landon, Galan, Jauniaux, Driscoll, Berghella, Grobman. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Seventh Edition. Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier, 2017: 477-478.
  4. Osman A, Halling C, Crume M, et al. Meconium aspiration syndrome: a comprehensive review. J Perinatol. 2023;43(10):1211-21. PubMed
  5. Chiruvolu A, Fine S, Miklis KK, Desai S. Perinatal risk factors associated with the need for resuscitation in newborns born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Resuscitation. 2023; 185:109728. PubMed
  6. Gallo DM, Romero R, Bosco M, et al. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1158-S1178. PubMed

Other References

  1. ACOG. Delivery of a Newborn With Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid. Published March 2017. Accessed November 3, 2025. Link
  2. Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, et al. Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S543-S560. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267 PubMed