Search on website
Filters
Show more
chevron-left-black Summaries

Anesthesia for Robotic Prostatectomy

Key Points

  • The main anesthetic challenges of robotic prostatectomies include pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning; thus, a comprehensive cardiopulmonary preoperative assessment is critical to ensure patient safety.
  • Compared with the open approach, robotic prostatectomies offer less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, and a faster recovery; however, it is generally accepted that long-term genitourinary oncologic and functional outcomes may not differ significantly and depend heavily on surgeon experience and technique.
  • Life-threatening anesthesia-specific postoperative concerns include airway edema, hypercapnic respiratory failure, and pulmonary embolism.

Introduction1-5

  • Prostatectomy is utilized for both benign (benign prostatic hyperplasia) and malignant (prostate cancer) indications.
  • A radical prostatectomy is the complete removal of the entire prostate, seminal vesicles, and vas deferens and is the primary surgical intervention for prostate cancer.
  • A simple prostatectomy is indicated when a higher prostate size precludes the implementation of endoscopic approaches for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, including urinary retention.
  • Robotic-assisted surgery can be utilized for both simple and radical prostatectomies.
  • Robotic approach for prostatectomy has become the predominant modality in the United States, with potential benefits including lower rates of blood loss, blood transfusions, and shorter hospital stays versus the open method.
  • Multiple analyses have suggested non-significant long-term differences in open versus robotic radical prostatectomy, including cancer outcomes, urinary function, and sexual function. However, this is highly dependent on the surgeon’s experience and technique.

Preoperative Evaluation4,6,7

  • Given the typical age distribution of prostate dysfunction and incidence of prostate cancer, most patients presenting for a robotic prostatectomy will be at mid-life or later with medical comorbidities associated with aging.
  • A thorough cardiovascular and pulmonary history is necessary to assess the associated risk of prolonged steep Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum.
  • Patients with severe obesity, severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction, a history of glaucoma, increased intraocular pressure, increased intracranial pressure, or severe obstructive lung disease may be poor candidates for robotic surgery and benefit from an open procedure.
  • Surgical considerations such as prior complex abdominal or pelvic surgery, obesity, large prostate or median lobe, presence of hernia, and prior radiation or prostate surgery can make prostatectomy challenging.

Intraoperative Management4,7-11

Case Preparation

  • Robotic surgical cases should be performed with general endotracheal tube anesthesia.
  • Given port placement, insufflation, patient position, and length of surgery, a neuraxial technique is contraindicated.
  • Patient positioning typically requires both arms tucked, which, aside from positioning precautions, may require further vascular access.
  • Primary positioning options include either supine with legs together, supine with use of a split-leg table, or lithotomy; this is often at the discretion of the surgeon.
  • Intraoperative urine output is often difficult to ascertain as the Foley catheter is not readily available to anesthesia, and the urinary tract is intentionally divided to remove the prostate.

Intraoperative Considerations

  • The two main intraoperative challenges of robotic prostatectomies include pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning, both of which can have profound effects on various organ systems, as detailed in Table 1.
  • Please see the OA summary “Patient Positioning: Physiologic Effects.” Link

Table 1. Effects of steep Trendelenburg on various organ systems7-9,11

  • Adequate padding and some mechanisms to prevent patient sliding are necessary for safe head-down positioning.
  • Nonslip pads underneath the patient and shoulder supports are the most commonly used devices to prevent patients from slipping during the steep Trendelenburg position.

Pneumoperitoneum

  • Abdominal insufflation can exacerbate many of the challenges previously discussed with head-down surgical positioning, as seen in Table 2.
  • Typical pneumoperitoneum is set to 15 mm Hg, though lower and/or higher settings may be utilized in a given case.
  • Notice the many physiological derangements similar to a steep Trendelenburg.
  • Please see the OA summary “Anesthesia for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery” for more details. Link

Table 2. Effects of pneumoperitoneum on various organ systems4,7,10,11

Analgesia

  • Multimodal analgesia is preferred including non-steroidal anti-inflammatories and acetaminophen along with opioids.
  • Epidural usage has shown little postoperative benefit and is contraindicated intraoperatively due to the potential for a high block in the steep head-down position in a traditional approach.
  • Some surgeons have employed a single-port transvesical approach, which limits insufflation in the intraperitoneal space and allows for safe regional techniques.12
  • There is mixed evidence that transverse abdominis plane blocks benefit patients with early postoperative pain.13

Intraoperative Surgical Complications

  • Acute blood loss, rectal injury, urine leak, lymphocele, trocar injury, vascular injury, and ureteral injury are possible intraoperative surgical complications.

Postoperative Considerations4,7,8,11

  • Airway edema should be suspected in every postoperative dyspneic patient following a prolonged robotic prostatectomy, attributed to both positioning and judicious fluid administration.
  • Typically, airway edema is accompanied with periorbital edema.
  • There is a lower incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in robotic prostatectomies compared to open procedures, but the patient incidence is still 0.5%
  • Tobacco use, a large prostate, and longer operating room time are all associated with an increased risk of VTE.

Postoperative Surgical Complications

  • The most common chronic functional complications encountered following robotic prostatectomy include incisional hernia, urinary incontinence, and erectile dysfunction
  • These incidences are all lower than with open prostatectomy; however, long-term analysis has failed to show clinically significant differences in quality of life.
  • In general, surgical functional outcomes are heavily influenced by key factors such as surgeon experience and technique at the time of prostatectomy.

References

  1. Wang J, Hu K, Wang Y, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Robot Surg. 2023. 17(6):2617-31. PubMed
  2. Gershman B, Psutka SP, McGovern FJ, et al. Patient-reported functional outcomes following open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by high-volume surgeons at high-volume hospitals. Eur Urol Focus. 2016. 2(2):172-9. PubMed
  3. Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic‐assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9(9). PubMed
  4. Meng MV. 2020. Robotic Surgery in Urology. In: Lue TF and McAninch JW. Smith & Tanagho’s General Urology. 19th edition. United States; McGraw-Hill; 2020, p.149.
  5. Mahon J, McVary KT. Lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Bhasin S, O’Leary MP, Basaria SS. eds. Essentials of Men’s Health. United States; McGraw-Hill; 2021. p. 283
  6. Kratzer TB, Mazzitelli N, Star J, et al. Prostate cancer statistics, CA Cancer J Clin. 2025; 75(6):485-97. PubMed
  7. Awad H, Walker CM, Shaikh M, et al. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth. 2012; ;24(6) :494-504. PubMed
  8. Kocman IB, Mihaljević S, Goluža E, et al. Anesthesia for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy-a challenge for anaesthesiologist. Acta Clinica Croatica, 2022; 61(Suppl 3): 76-80. PubMed
  9. Kikuno N, Urakam, S, Shigeno K, Kishi H, Shiina H, Igawa M. Traumatic rhabdomyolysis resulting from continuous compression in the exaggerated lithotomy position for radical perineal prostatectomy. Int J Urology. 2002; 9(9):521-524. PubMed
  10. Grabowski JE, Talamini MA. Physiological effects of pneumoperitoneum. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(5):1009-16. PubMed
  11. Conacher ID, Soomro NA, Rix D. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic urological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 93(6): 859-64. PubMed
  12. Ramos R, Soputro N, Pedraza AM, et al. Single port transvesical robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2025;39(S1):S39-S46. PubMed
  13. Maninishi H, Matsusaki T, Morimatsu H. Transversus abdominis plane block reduced early postoperative pain after robot-assisted prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3761. PubMed

Other References

  1. Rodi K, Villasenor M. Anesthesia for laparoscopic and robotic surgery. OA summary. 2024. Link
  2. Ravula N, Zagaynov C. Patient positioning: Physiologic effects. OA summary. 2023. Link